Search for: "O. W. vs STATE OF FLORIDA" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
GIBSON, JR., individually, Respondents. 2nd District.D&O Insurance: FLORIDA APPEALS COURT REVERSES D&O SETTLEMENT-OFFER RULING, Arrowood Indem. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Lexar Media (Patently-O) District Court W D Louisiana: What nunc pro tunc means: Epic Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 When one compares the 1999 and 2010 estimates (76 million vs. 47.8 million illnesses), the immediate response is to ask: Does this mean that food in this country is safer than it was 11 years ago? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Patently-O) Statutory bar prior art in the non-obviousness analysis (Patently-O) Patent prosecution rates (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC ruling opens possibility of using new evidence in Section 145 patent appeal proceedings: Hyatt vs. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
EchoStar (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Therasense to amplify demand for patent reexamination? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- Guilty plea -- Vacation -- Failure of trial court to advise defendant of immigration and deportation consequences of plea -- Trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to vacate guilty plea on ground that state failed to carry burden of proving that plea colloquy informed defendant of consequences of plea -- Burden of proof was on defendant to prove that colloquy did not inform him of consequences of… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
o o March 31, 2009 Argument Transcript hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereRicci v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:48 am
States should ban drivers from using hand-held and hands-free cell phones, and businesses should prohibit employees from using cell phones while driving on the job. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The authors nonetheless recommended the full battery because the latter tests provide some measure of performance impairment (vs. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Merck vs Roche: towards differential pricing: (Spicy IP), India/Philippines: Access to drugs: The India/Philippines solution? [read post]