Search for: "OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER v. Thompson"
Results 21 - 40
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Thompson was harsh, bordering on punitive, and the court should rethink its holding. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:14 pm
Discussing Thompson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 4:46 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
Trump will become Thompson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Indeed, that DA’s office had a notorious history of not disclosing exculpatory information to defendants, as required by the Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:11 pm
Cadet v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:42 am
Within minutes of learning of the nondisclosure, I contacted Chief Public Defender, Robert Ravitz to notify him of the allegations. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
Conversely, in Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
Gravel v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Kan. 2000) ("When a plaintiff names both a municipality and a municipal officer in his official capacity as defendants in an action, the suit against the officer is redundant, confusing, and unnecessary and should be dismissed"); Luke v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
And because this information was the glue that held much of the prosecution's case against Garrison together, he is entitled to a new trial on the charges of first degree perjury, attempt to influence a public servant (three counts), and conspiracy to attempt to influence a public servant.People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
Thompson ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his first motion to suppress because law enforcement officials commenced the search prior to the time authorized in the search warrant and (2) denied his second motion to suppress that had been filed pursuant to Franks v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 8:46 am
First, after the US Supreme Court okayed the practice in Atwater v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm
Both the Texas Judicial Council and the Texas Indigent Defense Commission, he said, have called for investments from the state for indigent criminal defense, as well as support for expanding public defenders’ offices and assigned counsel systems. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution.Background/Plaintiffs’ Claims in Thompson V. [read post]
