Search for: "OJ Basics"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 1:23 pm
Introduction In an earlier post on this blog (here), I commenced my analysis of the recognition of professional qualifications of migrants at work in the EU by describing and reflecting upon those provisions of EU migration and asylum law governing such recognition. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
Introduction In two blog posts (here, here) I have commented on the recognition of professional qualifications between the EU and UK post-Brexit. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:51 am
“Before filing suit, it would seem to be a reasonable expectation that the attorney do some basic research on the applicable law. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:11 pm
For example, the Case Law Book states: According to board of appeal case law (see T 1/80, OJ 1981, 206; T 20/81, OJ 1982, 217; T 24/81, OJ 1983, 133; T 248/85, OJ 1986, 261), the assessment of inventive step has to be based on the objective, not subjective, achievement of the inventor. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
OJ is flying off the shelves of your local Publix y mas.WHAT RUMPOLE IS READING: Less- the Pulitzer Prize winning quirky book by Andrew Greer. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:48 am
It is a cliche that it is often easier to slay messengers whose messages we find repugnant than to address who is sending the messages in the first place. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 3:24 pm
“Before filing suit, it would seem to be a reasonable expectation that the attorney do some basic research on the applicable law. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Since the appellant-proprietor does not consent to its introduction into the appeal proceedings, the board has no authority to examine it, see G10/91 (OJ 1993, 408 and 420).4.1 In G9/91 and G10/91 (OJ 1993, 408 and 420) the Enlarged Board of Appeal held that Rule 76(2)(c) EPC has inter alia the function of establishing the legal and factual framework of the opposition including the grounds for opposition. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
This case is about the novelty of the Cripps Pink variety (Malus Domestica Borkh species) as assessed under the Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community Plant Variety Rights (OJ 1994 L227, ‘the Basic Regulation’). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Compared to the defendants featured in prior posts, Alex Levin is no Adnan Syed or OJ Simpson in terms of pop culture fame, but that’s largely because the government’s methods to investigate Levin stole the show. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
First, and most basically, an officer might rely on their own direct information—such as personal observation. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:27 am
One example of this approach is found in the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in the UK,[15] but others are available.[16] The obligation to report annually on compliance with basic standards at the very least provides potential consumers of goods and services with a central repository of reports concerning compliance. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:00 pm
Let’s explore some of the basics. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
The patent application in this case was refused for lack of novelty based on MPEG standards-related documentation cited in the search report. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Of these, learning to learn is perhaps the most important; it is the most fundamental—basic—skill because ‘learning to learn supports all learning activities’.[7] The Commission’s role in relation to the development of key competences by member state nationals is to, inter alia, use the recommendation as a reference to facilitate peer learning and the exchange of good practices between the member states. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:59 am
It will apply 12 months after publication in the OJ of the delegated acts referred to in Article 28(5) (Content of the PEPP KID), Article 30(2) (Revision of the PEPP KID), Article 33(3) (Provision of the PEPP KID), Articles 36(2) and 37(2) (PEPP benefit statement), Article 45(3) (Basic PEPP) and Article 46(3) (Risk-mitigation techniques). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
If a professional representative is appointed, the duty of all due care applies both to the applicants themselves and their professional representatives (J 5/80, OJ EPO 1981, 343, reasons 4; J 3/08, reasons 4; T 742/11, reasons 3; T 2274/11, reasons 3). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:21 am
The wording of Article 123(3) EPC is only a clarification in that respect (OJ EPO 2007, Special Edition 4, page 144). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
The question which now arises is what link, if any, exists between the right to work, which must be understood as the foundational and most basic right related to work, and other, derivative rights in EU law. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board noted, inter alia, that the case bore some similarity to decision T 1227/05 (OJ EPO 2007, 574), in which the numerical simulation of a noise-affected circuit had been found to be a functional technical feature. [read post]
