Search for: "Odom v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am by Zack Bluestone
In a symbolic show of force, the United States dispatched “a small armada” to patrol the disputed waters of the South China Sea, according to the Navy Times. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm by cdw
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas,  2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Premium Aircraft (EPLAW)   United States US General Team Conan leaving jokes behind (IP Osgoode)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation update (Inventive Step)   US Patents First-to-file vs first-to-invent: Why is there a Dispute? [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am by Marie Louise
Echostar en banc decision stands (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC confirms Odom’s patent invalid: Gary Odom v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘IP on the net’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Change.gov content now under creative commons license (EFF) (Creative Commons) (Lessig) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) (Creative Commons) DMCA exemption petitions (ContentAgenda) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (EFF)… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
” For its part, the United States expressed a more restrained sense of optimism, at least officially. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am by Anna Salvatore
” They talked about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit, the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]