Search for: "Oki Data Americas, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 4:40 pm
(collectively “Ricoh”); and the Respondents are Oki Data Corp. and Oki Data Americas, Inc (collectively “Oki Data”). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:05 am
As the Panel notes in Steinway, the “prevailing view in other UDRP cases is that a reseller of goods has a right to incorporate a manufacture’s mark in an offering of goods and services” when it passes a test originally formulated in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:24 am
The general rule is traceable to Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:17 am
It is possible for a legitimate interest to come into existence without complainant’s approval – offering goods or services on the secondary market, Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Regal Ware, Inc et al (Docket Report) ITC decides not to review initial determination on invalidity in certain printing and imaging devices involving Ricoh and Oki Data (ITC Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear Technology and Advanced Analogic Technologies (ITC Law Blog) Defending yourself in inequitable conduct proceedings – CAFC en banc hearing pending: Therasense,… [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:35 pm
The Respondents are Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas, Inc (collectively, “Oki Data”). [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:22 pm
No. 337-TA-690) granting-in-part Respondents Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
No. 337-TA-690) denying Respondents Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:56 pm
No. 337-TA-690) granting-in-part Respondents Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:17 am
The defense has been construed to exclude competitors, but can be effective for parties that incorporate a complainant’s trademark under the four-part test formulated by the Panel in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:15 am
” This principle is traceable to Oki Data Americas, D2001-0903 (WIPO November 6, 2001); see, also, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:16 pm
No. 337-TA-690) denying Respondents Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
First it was authorized resellers whose incorporation of a complainant’s trademark was deemed to be legitimate if they met the 4-part test originally announced in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
Further, according to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Oki Data Corporation of Japan Oki Data Americas, Inc. of Mount Laurel, New Jersey Additionally, Christopher G. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Oki Data Corporation and Oki Data Americas Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
The complaint alleges that Oki Data Corporation of Japan and Oki Data Americas, Inc. of Mount Laurel, New Jersey (collectively, "Oki Data") unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and sell within the U.S. after importation certain printing and imaging devices, including multifunction printers ("MFP"), and components thereof, including at least image drums and fuser units, which allegedly… [read post]
