Search for: "Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
A claim for legal malpractice can be viable “despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that the settlement was effectively compelled by [the] mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990] [holding settlement of underlying action did not compel dismissal]). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
A legal malpractice cause of action “is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1990]; see Maroulis v Sari M. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:36 am
” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
A legal malpractice cause of action “is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the [*2]mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am
With 34 years in the industry, he also was previously a representative for UBS Financial (UBS), Raymond James & Associates (RJF), First Union Securities, McDonald Investments Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
Oppenheim & Co., 160 A.D.2d 428, 431 (1st Dept. 1990). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
Contrary to purported ongoing representation by decedent’s family and advisors, the record evidence demonstrates the lack of a mutual understanding that defendant would continue to represent the estate in the Devine action, even if there was a continuation of a general professional relationship (see Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:38 am
Sound Financial, LLC David Wayne Krumrey Oppenheimer & Co Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am
Co. v Coleman, 305 AD2d 151, 152 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
The record clearly establishes an attorney-client relationship, as defendant entered into two stipulations extending Billiard’s time to answer in an underlying personal injury action, which were filed in court, and represented itself as Billiard’s attorney (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 455 [1st Dept 1987]; compare Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Co. v Coleman, 305 AD2d 151, 152 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
Stewart Title Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
With insider trading law up in the air after the Second Circuit decision in US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:28 am
Luego, el 2 de septiembre, Besosa rechazó la petición del gobierno para que se detuviera la demanda presentada el 20 de julio por las firmas Lex Claim; Jacana Holdings ( I, II, III, IV y V); MPR Investors LLC; ROLSG; RRW I LLC y SL Puerto Rico Fund II LP. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:23 pm
Minn. case that in turn quotes Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
No. 3-16976, for failure to comply with audit standards; its actions against broker-dealers such as Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
He has also been friends with Vladimir Eydelman, a registered representative with Oppenheimer & Co., for years. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
Magdalena Tavella, Andres Horacio Ficicchia, Gonzalo Garcia Blaya, Lucia Mariana Hernando, Cecilia de Lorenzo, Adriana Rosa Bagattin, Daniella Patricia Goldman, Mariano Pablo Ferrari, Mariano Graciarena, and Fernando LoureyroCase number: 13-cv-04609 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 3, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 9, 2015 2/27/2015 5/28/2015 2015-16 In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:01 am
Not easy to settle with four large organizations based overseas… Meanwhile, as noted in this blog, the SEC’s concept release on audit committees is expected as early as next month… SEC Grants Second Bad Actor Waiver With Conditions: Redux Recently, I blogged about the SEC granting its second bad actor waiver with conditions – to Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
See, e.g., Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Allvoice’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Oppenheimer v. [read post]
