Search for: "Oracle USA, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 6:18 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
.- Attorneys for Oracle USA, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation (collectively “Oracle”) of Colorado and California, respectively, filed suit in the District Court of Nevada alleging that Rimini Street, Inc. and Seth Ravin, both of Nevada, infringed the copyrights for Oracle Software and Technology, which have been registered by the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
Oracle USA, clarifying what “full costs” means under the Copyright Act, and restricting costs a prevailing party can recover in copyright litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., the justices ruled unanimously that the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs and does not include nontaxable costs such as expert-witness fees. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
Oracle USA Inc., about whether “full costs” in the Copyright Act means the costs specified in a general federal costs statute. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:43 pm by Steve Brachmann
Oracle USA, Inc., which asked whether the meaning of “full costs” under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Nicholas Chan
Oracle USA, Inc. that Oracle was not entitled to a $12.8 million award for certain litigation expenses beyond what is considered “full costs” of attorneys fees under 28 USC §§ 1821 and 1920. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Oracle USA Inc., holding that that the copyright act’s allowance of “full costs” only extends to traditional “taxable costs” and does not include, for instance, expert witness, e-discovery, or jury consultant fees. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., about the scope of the costs awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc. , in which the justices considered whether the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs or also authorizes nontaxable costs. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Oracle USA Inc.: The case asks the Court to determine what costs are available to the prevailing party in a copyright suit. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Oracle USA Inc is also available. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle USA Inc., which asks whether the term “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright case is limited to taxable costs or also authorizes nontaxable costs. [read post]