Search for: "Oregon v. Ball" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
  This question was recently answered by the District Court of Oregon in Jacobus Rentmeester v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
Before Watergate, state judicial elections, for the most part, were small-ball operations. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
Taken from court documentsPhortographer Jacobus Rentmeester is suing Nike in the federal court in Oregon for copyright infringement. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Oregon: Ducks favored by 34 Our call: Oregon 44-28    Result: - New Mexico State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
Oregon State Beavers by 28.5 Oregon St. 38-14 Oregon St. 31-7 William & Mary v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
 I am required to attempt to predict -- and I need a much bigger crystal ball than I am using -- what the Oregon Supreme Court would do with this theory. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
| Ball in your Court - bit.ly/uKcfxC (Craig Ball) Judge Tries To Moot 'Profound' eDiscovery Dispute, Parties Say No - bit.ly/yebA1X (Alison Frankel) Keeping It Together – Tracking Tasks and Decisions Related to eDiscovery - bit.ly/y8BlPM (Michelle Kovitch) Lessons Learned for 2012: Spotlighting the Top eDiscovery Cases from 2011 - bit.ly/wqSfPo (Philip Favro) Metadata: Complying with Oregon Formal Opinion 2011-187 - bit.ly/y3AHEz (Beverly Michaelis) New… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Holmes, Ball State University: Negotiating ‘Best Interest:’ The Voice of the Advocate in the Foster Care System. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:28 pm by pgbarnes
“I’m a mother coming into a very male-oriented business,” Silberkleit told Oregon Live. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by Russ Bensing
  Three years later, in Oregon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]