Search for: "Oregon v. Kennedy" Results 21 - 40 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Kennedy International Airport—New York, New York Los Angeles International Airport—Los Angeles, California Memphis, Tennessee Miami International Airport—Miami, Florida Milwaukee, Wisconsin Nashville, Tennessee Newark, New Jersey Ohio Orlando, Florida Philadelphia Raleigh Durham Airport—Raleigh, North Carolina San Diego International—San Diego, California San Francisco International—San Francisco, California Seattle, Washington Vermont Washington DC,… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am by Rory Little
The year-old retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who authored the most recent decision on the issue, makes the outcome difficult to predict. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Oregon, the Supreme Court concluded that the Sixth Amendment required that juries convict by a unanimous vote, but concluded that this requirement does not apply to the states; accordingly, a state criminal defendant may lawfully be convicted based on (for example) a 9-3 vote. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:59 am by Amy Howe
Invoking language from the majority’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
The Wayfair Decision Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the opinion for the five-justice majority. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:27 am by Lyle Denniston
In fact, Judge Aiken in her opinion in the Oregon case quoted this guidance from Kennedy’s same-sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The Supreme Court did kill Quill, with Justice Kennedy writing for the majority, “Because the physical presence rule of Quill is unsound and incorrect, Quill Corp. v. [read post]