Search for: "Oster v. Oster"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am
See Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am
” – Patrick Oster, a writer for Bloomberg News, in an online column on June 9, under the headline: “Supreme Court’s Landmark U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
In a separate memorandum and order, the magistrate judge also considered and denied in part motions filed by the parties to exclude one another’s expert testimony from review as part of the certification motion (Chen-Oster v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
See Chen-Oster v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:53 am
Francis IV in Chen-Oster, et al., v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:52 am
Three female employees seeking class certification of pattern-or-practice gender bias claims on behalf of female professionals in Goldman Sachs’ four revenue-generating divisions were entitled to unredacted copies of all internal complaints made by female employees within the four divisions that were “conceivably related” to gender discrimination, even if the complainant was not a member of the putative class, a federal magistrate judge in New York ruled, granting the… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
In the third case, Chen-Oster v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:17 am
First, the court cited the recent case of Chen-Oster v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
See Chen-Oster v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
The settlement resolves a federal lawsuit, David Oster et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Horton and the Southern District of New York’s decision in Chen-Oster v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:30 am
And within the influential Second Circuit, in Chen-Oster v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument this morning in Chen-Oster v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:10 am
OSRAM GmbH, Opposition No. 91171206 [Opposition to OSTAR for "light emitting diodes; light emitting diode displays and display circuit modules; and components of the aforementioned goods" on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and dilution of, the registered mark OSTER for a wide variety of goods, including electric hair clippers, toasters, heat massage machines and food mixers].September 19, 2012, 2012 - 2 PM: Fair Isaac Corporation v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:23 pm
See Chen-Oster v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
The '188 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Shin v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
The '188 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Shin v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:28 am
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
