Search for: "Owusu v. Ins*" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The section does not apply to any claims where jurisdiction has been taken under the Regulation or the Lugano Convention, as in those cases the defendant can be sued “as of right” – wherever the claimant is situated – under the rule in C-281/02 Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:50 am
On 30 January 2009, the Irish Supreme Court decided in Goshawk Dedicated Limited and Kite Dedicated Limited formerly known as Goshawk Dedicated (No. 2) Ltd, and Cavell Management Services Ltd, and Cavell Managing Agency Ltd v. [read post]
He observed that the test for duty of care in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990]  2 AC 605[3] was not necessarily the starting point in establishing whether a duty of care is owed by a parent company as this was not a “novel category of common law negligence liability”, but rather had already been considered in previous cases. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
But not those whose last chance to avoid closure or insolvency is a successful claim – colloquially, ‘bet-all’ claimants. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The objection of forum non conveniens does not apply in the Brussels I Regulation system (as clarified in the CJEU’s Owusu decision). [read post]