Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 21 - 40
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
In my forthcoming article, I discuss Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 and the administrative legacy its implementation history has had on the SEC. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:59 am
Just remember to take the proper steps before you act though, and if you’re still not sure on how to proceed, ask an attorney - that’s what they’re for after all. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:06 am
Once attention switches from healthcare reform to financial reform, I hope we don't re-fight the last war. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
When politicians think about re-election, they often think about keeping their source of funds happy. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
As we've said many times before, we're not attorneys (though Sonya is a former attorney) and this is the first Supreme Court case we've tried to parse, so our analysis is worth what you're paying for it. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:36 pm
I was interviewed by Marketplace reporter Ashley Milney-Tyte for a story on Sarbanes-Oxley today. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 3:30 am
Often, companies’ finance and accounting staffs bemoan the lack of slack on the part of outside auditors in the Sarbanes-Oxley era. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
If you’re interested in hearing more of my thoughts on this let me know…. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:59 pm
--Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:22 am
Apart from requiring that PCAOB members could be removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission “at will” rather than “for cause”, the Court did not require any significant changes in the operation of the PCAOB.All is well also on the flip side.The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley act is also safe.Opposers to the act, who were hoping that this case might shut down the legislation, or at minimum, force Congress to re-examine its foundation and lessen its… [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
Many business leaders have complained about the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other measures passed in reaction to the scandals at Enron and WorldCom. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:18 am
That way, they're more likely to take ownership of the program's success. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:44 am
For many corporate critics of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2002 law has become synonymous with added cost and work. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:19 am
...but if you are a multi-million dollar corporation (and therefore subject to Sarbanes-Oxley) you might want to hire an expert, not a dummy.From the product description on Amazon:Whether you're a CEO or a file clerk, it's important to understand Sarbanes-Oxley, the post-Enron legislation aimed at keeping corporations honest and ethical. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
Sarbanes-Oxley? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:10 pm
Koehler notes that even if Wal-Mart successfully defends the Mexican outlays as lawful “facilitating payments,” the company could still be accused of violating FCPA’s “books and records” and internal control provisions as well as Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 12:03 pm
If you're interested in attending the lunch, there's information here. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:41 am
Maybe Wall Street analysts are more honest and less compromised than they were pre-Sarbanes-Oxley, but recent events show that they’re still awful at their most important job: predicting bad news, writes Fortune’s Geoff Colvin. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:38 pm
Hopefully, "Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404A Guide for Small Business" from the SEC takes some of the sting out of it. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
While we’re on the topic of whistleblowers, this CLS Blue Sky blog from Ropes & Gray discusses the recent SCOTUS decision in Murray v. [read post]
