Search for: "P Hastings"
Results 21 - 40
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Koppelman, The Use and Abuse of Tradition: A comment on DeGirolami’s Traditionalism Rising, (Journal of Contemporary Legal issues, 2023 Forthcoming).Jane Tien, From The Vatican With Cash: Prosecuting Money Laundering In London Real Estate, (University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 30, 2022).Shubhankar Agnihotri, A Critical Analysis of Doctrine of Pious Obligation, (March 10, 2022).SpearIt, Understanding an American Paradox: An Overview of The Racial… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
(forthcoming)).Arvind P. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
” We have to assume that this wheeze was dreamed up in some haste, meeting the immediate political imperative to respond to a strongly supported back bench amendment that tried to tack videos of boat crossings on to the Bill’s children’s duties. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
Regulators and courts will have to carefully assess whether public companies manipulated the valuation process to deceive investors or whether stock declines reflect the bursting of a bubble.[2] The equity market selloff in 2022, which contributed to the worst year since 2008 for the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, has exposed U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:28 pm
” PTO-P-2022-0037-0010. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:04 pm
Greer, Matthew P. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:51 am
Greer, Matthew P. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
The following is a guest post by Emma Brodfuehrer Hastings, a summer intern with the Digital Resources Division of the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Grocery Drivers Union, 233 P.2d 617, 619 (Cal. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm
In a working paper published as part of the Bayreuth Food Law Working Paper Series, Jessica Vapnek of University of California Hastings College of the Law, Kai P. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
” Eugene Volokh, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, 73 Hastings L.J. 1353, 1426 (2022). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:21 pm
Pix credit here I take this opportunity to post for comment a discussion draft recently completed. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
By majority (Sharp P and Dingemans LJ), the appeal was dismissed. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
The Executive Order aims, in part, to “[p]rotect[] the privacy of patients and their access to accurate information” regarding reproductive health care services. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
“[P]eriodic bouts of litigation in federal district court, starting in 1975” – with Martha’s regulatory taking action seeking $6 million for County’s downzoning of its property from a minimum of 300 to a maximum of 27 units – resulted in “two stipulated judgments, one in 1976, the other in 2007[,]” the “most significant aspect [of which] was that the County twice solemnly – and publicly – agreed to approve Martha… [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:48 am
Gordon Lubold, Courtney McBride and Warren P. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, in explaining in Rucho why state but not federal courts could have a role in this realm, observed that in contrast to the federal Constitution’s lack of relevant direction to federal courts, “[p]rovisions in state statutes and state constitutions can provide standards and guidance for state courts to apply. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:01 am
Cardozo School of Law 3:30 pm, Fifth Workshop: Professor Evelyn Rangel, University of California Hastings College of the Law 4:15 pm, Sixth Workshop: Professor P. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
