Search for: "P. v. Carey"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
Carey, 172 F.3d 1268 (U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:52 am
Jacot, 235 Ariz. 224, 330 P.3d 981 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:52 am
In 2010 in Carey v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
Winter v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:58 am
§§ 441a(a)(1)(c) and 441a(a)(3), were ruled unenforceable by the District Court in a prior decision, Carey v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
In Carey v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
S. 915 (vacating and remanding in light of Carey v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:03 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
In an statement released by the FEC, it stated, consistent with its agreement to a stipulated order and consent judgment in Carey v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:44 am
They reached this conclusion even though separate accounts would be used, as recently allowed for independent expenditure committees by the FEC after the Carey v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:59 am
Carey, Sup Ct NY County 2001, affd, Kremen v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Tinker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The book only says that “on Sunday evening, December 13, Carey sent an email to the team announcing that the decision had been made to go forward. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:07 am
In Carey v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:49 am
The plaintiff in this matter was represented by Brigid Carey, Esquire and the defendant is represented by P. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:02 am
Among the new members are these academics: CaliforniaColleen V. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
