Search for: "P. v. Floyd" Results 21 - 40 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In particular, as the Court of Appeal explained: It was common ground that for an appeal on obviousness to succeed, it has to be shown that the Judge made an error of principle, see Biogen v Medeva [1997] RPC 1 at p.45. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
” LSE Media Policy Project had a post “George Floyd, racism, white privilege and the media”. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Julie Lam
Floyd, No. 142617-8, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated that part of its order that found a violation of People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:29 pm by Brian Clarke
  [The caption is 19 pages long, so keep scrolling to p. 20 to get to the actual opinion.] [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
Footnote for privacy/publicity people: this case was originally listed as P v E, apparently because of the alleged commercial sensitivity of a percentage figure in one of the clauses of the 1999 Agreement. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:12 pm
("J & J Sports") of Campbell, California filed two federal lawsuits in the Northern District of Indiana, both alleging illegal interception of a cable signal for the Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
En ambos vídeos se percibe también la falta de empatía hacia la víctima de parte de los otros oficiales que acompañaban al policía victimario mientras la víctima agonizaba, ello a pesar de los reclamos de muchos transeúntes que valientemente reclamaban por la vida de esta última. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
On 18 February 2014, the Court of Appeal (Elias, Lewison and Floyd LJJ) allowed the appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by NL
Pritchard & Ors v Teitelbaum & Ors [2011] EWHC 1063 (Ch) This case forms part of the aftermath of Fineland Investments Ltd v Janice Vivien Pritchard [2011] EWHC 113 (Ch) (our report here). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by NL
Pritchard & Ors v Teitelbaum & Ors [2011] EWHC 1063 (Ch) This case forms part of the aftermath of Fineland Investments Ltd v Janice Vivien Pritchard [2011] EWHC 113 (Ch) (our report here). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 am
Olson of Washington, arguing for Citizens United, 30 minutes [some of that time will be saved for rebuttal after all others have argued]; Floyd Abrams of New York, arguing for Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, 10 minutes; Solicitor General Kagan, for the FEC, 30 minutes, and Seth P. [read post]