Search for: "P. v. Murray"
Results 21 - 40
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 2:28 pm
It's a class action against a particular (very expensive) dental machine, which the plaintiffs say isn't up to snuff because defendants market it as good for "[p]eriodontal debridement for all types of periodontal diseases" (e.g., oral surgery) but in fact doesn't work for that since it accumulates biofilm and hence can't deliver the required sterile water.The case goes on forever. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
Hundreds of other cases were similarly effected without being appealed: Murray v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Reproduced below are just a few of them: Murray v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Thompson, Peter P. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
Murray, 07-2060 (8th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:46 am
In a January 27 decision in Murray v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:11 pm
Murray, 501 P.3d 961 (2021). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:27 am
In Murray v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
In the case of Simone v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Reproduced below are a few of them: Murray v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Palmer Civil Liberties Prize has been awarded to Thomas P. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
See Murray v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm
Here is the opinion, Rhodes v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
See Murray v Mariners Health, 994 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 2008). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:21 pm
Mora, 262 P.2d 594 (Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
See Murray v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
EXAMPLES OF FORMULA FEE AWARDS Murray v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:03 am
From Rogowski v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 6:29 am
Donohue, United States v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:56 am
California (1960) and McIntyre v. [read post]
