Search for: "PACE v. PACE" Results 21 - 40 of 2,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am by Laura
I grew up in this fast-paced city of skyscrapers, curry fish balls and impeccably efficient transport services, and spent formative years of my career practising law in Hong Kong. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
House Bill 1435/ Senate Bill 783 (both passed) known as the Brighter Tomorrow Act seeks to bolster solar in the State that has failed to keep pace with the Renewable Portfolio Standard nation leading mandate of 14.5% solar power by 2030 (i.e., 55% of that target by 2022), by among other matters causing the PSC to establish a Small Solar Energy Generating System Incentive Program (a key feature of which will include an artificially inflated value for SRECs). [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  “The requirement to give Miranda warnings came from the Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm by Aaron Moss
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
Proving non-cooperation, though, is challenging, as seen in a recent Eighth Circuit case, Cardinal Building Materials, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by JD Hull
Key ongoing internal project v. new client project. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  AI could tip the balance here such that it works a material harm on the pace and profit of creative work, and all in the AI ecosystem will benefit if the pace and profitability of content creation continue to be fairly incentivized; 2) Misinformation concerns already constitute a compelling interest that government regulation can and should address. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In view of the conclusive evidence establishing the absence of legal representation by defendants on any personal injury action, the court incorrectly determined that the legal malpractice claim was timely under the continuous representation doctrine (see Pace v Horowitz, 190 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2021]; Knobel v Wei Group, LLP, 160 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2018]) and that it was factually sustainable (see Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C., 180 AD3d… [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Will Newman
I think maybe a more fitting observation (and one that Gemini noted in the Apple v. [read post]