Search for: "PAMMER"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 1:43 am
Following the ECJ’s decisions in Pammer and Alpenhof which dealt with the targeted activity-criterion of Article 15 I lit. c) Brussels I, the questions are meant to shed light on the provisions’ nexus-requirement: 1. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Axa and Pammer/Hotel Alpenhof: Marielle Koppenol-Laforce, Herschikking Brussel I: litispendentie en forumkeuze, een positieve stap voorwaarts!? [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
C-585/08, Peter Pammer c/ Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:22 am
EBRAHIMI, An Overview of the Private International Law of Iran: Theory and Practice Adi CHEN, Conflict of Laws, Conflict of Mores and External Public Policy in Israel: Registration and Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decrees – A Modern Critique Court Decisions Michael BOGDAN, Website Accessibility as a Basis for Jurisdiction under Art. 15(1)(C) of the Brussels I Regulation – Case Note on the ECJ Judgments Pammer and Alpenhof Eva LEIN, Modern Art – The ECJ’s… [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:21 am
This issue includes two casenotes, one in Dutch and one in French, commenting on the Pammer / Alpenhof case. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
USA: Oklahoma's lawsuit against online travel companies dismissedGermany: Montreal liabilty limit for lost baggage applies per passenger regardless of number of checked pieces of baggageUNWTO: tourism a vehicle for gender equalityEgypt: Minister of Tourism initiates new tourism campaignIreland: Eyjafjallajökull eruption referred to the ECJFinland: new reference for ECJ preliminary ruling regarding Reg. 261/2004 and "denied boarding"Austria: Supreme Court refers Pammer… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:31 am
The voyage booked by Mr Pammer was descried on the website of the company. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
The European Court of Justice in its Judgment in Joined Cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm
But Reederei Karl Schlüter reimbursed only a part of what Mr Pammer had paid. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:23 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Ms Verica Trstenjak in Case C-585 / 08 (Pammer) and Case C-144 / 09 (Hotel Alpenhof) was presented on May 18, 2010. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
It also introduces the Austrian reference on Art. 15(3) ‘Brussels I' in the "Pammer" case (now also Case C-144/09, Alpenhof v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
Peter Pammer v. [read post]
