Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 21 - 40
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am
This standing rule of the public dedication doctrine was far from perfect (we shift to the past tense because the Illinois Supreme Court repudiated the common-law version of the doctrine in 1970, in Paepcke v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
This provision ensures that the state cannot confiscate a citizen’s property without following the proper legal procedures. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
(Ilya Somin) Eight years after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
Nakazawa v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
(Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Yesterday the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in Bonidy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:19 am
Park, the Mesaros defendants, and Plaintiffs each cite Bray v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
When Droste v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:31 am
Abbott Orange Citizens for Parks and Recreation v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
More generally, it tries to pervasively stop private citizens from expressing such speech on government property. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
G.M. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
" See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
Marshall v City of Philadelphia, 2014 WL 3579694 (PA 7/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1673382.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 2:05 pm
From Morris v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
In Arsenault v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:44 pm
Hohman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 3:49 pm
” Papadopoulos v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Fakhoury v O’Reilly, 2020 WL 6781236 (6th Cir CA 11/18/2020) [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Guilfoil v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:24 pm
"If the car is parked on public property, it would basically be allowing commercial use of a public property," said Lt. [read post]
