Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 2,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2007, 7:35 am by Veronica
Randall County Sheriff's Office by holding that an indigence affidavit can be filed after the appellate court grants a party 10 extra days to pay the filing fee. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Bridgewater filed a lawsuit against the RTA and the City of New Orleans and added the Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court will hold a further hearing for the purpose of assessing the penalty amount. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:32 am by Patricia Salkin
The parties did not dispute that service of the petition and writ were perfected on the City; however, the City disputed service on the ZBA, and Discovery voluntarily dismissed the action. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm by ALeonard
City ordinance, holding that since the plaintiff was not a city resident and the incident giving rise to the claim arose north of the city line, the City Ordinance did not apply, even though Metro-North was headquartered in the city. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The City served its Statement of Defence on March 14, 2011, the City pleading inter alia that the parties had agreed to submit any disputes arising under the contract to arbitration. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:41 pm by Scott McKeown
As a reminder, Windy City held that 315(c) was unambiguous that an existing “party” to a proceeding cannot be joined as a party. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
In July 2009, the Mongols Nation Motorcycle Club, Inc. planned to hold its annual convention in Lancaster, California. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
In July 2009, the Mongols Nation Motorcycle Club, Inc. planned to hold its annual convention in Lancaster, California. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:18 am
West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001), holding at page 606 that a party was not a prevailing party unless there was a “material alteration in the legal relationship of the parties. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Trek Development Group, Inc., The Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (URA), and the City of Pittsburgh appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County reversing the decision of the City’s Zoning Board of Adjustment – granting Trek’s variances and special exception. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]