Search for: "PEREZ v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
McClung, 379 U.S. 274 (1964) (Commerce power extended to application of anti-discrimination statute to a local restaurant that served almost purely local customers where its food was ordered in interstate commerce); Perez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 13-445Issue: (1) Whether the cost-causation principle underlying the “just and reasonable” standard of the Federal Power Act permits the socialization of costs across a regional transmission network without regard to the actual costs caused or benefits received by customers required to pay those costs; and (2) whether an administrative agency may concededly rely upon extra-record evidence without providing the parties notice and an… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Perez is already receiving significant attention. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
More broadly, income subject to substantial information reporting requirements includes pensions, annuities, interest income, dividend income, unemployment compensation, and taxable Social Security benefits. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court Asks Biden Administration to Weigh in on Social Media Case MSN – Robert Barnes and Cat Zakrzewski (Washington Post) | Published: 1/23/2023 The U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Careful social science research, led by Dr. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
W and B v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
