Search for: "PETERS v. PETERS" Results 21 - 40 of 8,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
 LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In this respect, it is generally admitted that borderline should be that the enforcing court should refrain from reviewing the determination of facts and application of law made by the foreign court “as if it were an appellate tribunal reviewing how the “lower court” decided the case” (Peter Hay, Advance Introduction to Private International Law and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2018) 121). [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:53 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
The latest decision may be an indicator that the tide is beginning to change on document access requests in the UPC following the Court of Appeal decision in Ocado v AutoStore, at least in the context of revocation actions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]