Search for: "PETERS v. PETERS"
Results 21 - 40
of 8,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:10 am
Seifert v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
In this respect, it is generally admitted that borderline should be that the enforcing court should refrain from reviewing the determination of facts and application of law made by the foreign court “as if it were an appellate tribunal reviewing how the “lower court” decided the case” (Peter Hay, Advance Introduction to Private International Law and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2018) 121). [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:53 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:39 pm
Myers v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
The latest decision may be an indicator that the tide is beginning to change on document access requests in the UPC following the Court of Appeal decision in Ocado v AutoStore, at least in the context of revocation actions. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:17 am
Read the opinion The post NDOKELY PETER ENOW v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
Contact Guelph Employment Lawyer Peter A. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
Contact Guelph Employment Lawyer Peter A. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
However, no further guidance was provided in its decision in SES v Hanshow. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
18 May 2024, 9:01 am
Boulos v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:28 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In, Nathaniel Bickley v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:03 am
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Tiffany Diggins v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:46 am
The Plimsouls v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorney. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]