Search for: "PIERCE v. C. I. T. CORP." Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Prohias I sticks just to the drug cases and cites Heindel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:45 pm
You Can’t Have “Personal Knowledge” About Events Before Your Birth Gilbert Kerlin, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:29 am
However, in that case, the court rejected four paragraphs from the complaint that were `”threadbare recitations” of factors cited by Georgia courts in deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
If we don’t have any transcript, then we’ve also listed it, but in red. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If I feel like I’m totally unable to get fees if I don’t make an offer, that will discourage legitimate disputes. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
MacKinnon (Michigan), Maria T. [read post]