Search for: "PIERCE v. C. I. T. CORP." Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
Veiled Cat Although not in any way connected with IP, the scope of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil is to be considered in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and others. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
If we don’t have any transcript, then we’ve also listed it, but in red. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If I feel like I’m totally unable to get fees if I don’t make an offer, that will discourage legitimate disputes. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm by Bexis
  Some parts of Hall were adopted in AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
Once the Court determined that Anna's counterclaims weren't core, then the judgment entered by the bankruptcy court in favor of Anna wasn't final at the time the Texas Probate Court issued its judgment in favor of Pierce. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
MacKinnon (Michigan), Maria T. [read post]