Search for: "POLK V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
In Mapp v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:03 am
Polk County, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 2330854 (M.D.Fla . [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Lawrence Portnoy, partner in the Litigation Department at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, and is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum by Michael S. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Balzourt v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:55 am
Polk . [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=5UWRypqz5-o&feature=related Full Reports 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:27 pm
The recent Chancery decision in Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:26 am
Not soon after I blogged about a few members of the US Supreme Court questioning the deference given to the SEC in the enforcement context, a federal court rules against a Corp Fin no-action response in the shareholder proposal context in Trinity Wall Street v Wal-Mart Stores. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:23 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from James P. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
20 May 2020, 8:17 am
The Second Circuit explained that groups’ reliance on a two-part test from the Supreme Court case of US Dept. of Justice v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:49 am
This post is based on their Davis Polk memorandum. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
New York v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:06 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The amendment of the IEEPA statute of limitations has wider implications, as IEEPA is a broad and flexible authority used for other measures related to national security. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
