Search for: "POLK V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The SEC uses the term “competitive shortfall” to describe the difference between its predicted price improvement under the Order Competition Rule and the current price improvement from wholesale market makers—that is, how much better the SEC believes that retail participants would do under the Order Competition Rule. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 8:37 am
See Polk Cnty. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 11:20 am
Instead, the court gave us Gregorini v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Most Viewed Posts of 2022 Here are the most viewed posts that were published in 2022: What American Hospital Association v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:17 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 3:50 am
,”‘Lockstep’ falls out of step with modern law firms,” FT.com, Dec 16, 2021 (discussing recent changes at Linklaters and Cravath); Debra Cassens Weiss, “BigLaw firm switches from strict lockstep compensation for partners to modified system,” ABA Journal, Sept 11, 2020 (discussing changes to lockstep model at Davis Polk). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
In a subsequent essay later this summer, I’ll use this baseline to start constructing my studier, more informed, and more realistic view of the world, which is a precondition to making a difference. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:36 pm
From the decision Thursday by Judge Katherine Polk Failla (S.D.N.Y.) in Maron v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:08 pm
” Polk v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Danielle is then prosecuted, because state law provides that deadly force can't be used in self-defense if "[t]he actor knows that he can avoid the necessity of using such force with complete safety … by complying with a demand that he abstain from any action which he has no duty to take. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
