Search for: "POWERS v. COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE"
Results 21 - 40
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am
For instance, the European Commission (case no. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Any lawyer that exercises public power has a higher duty to act with transparency, accountability, and with regards to Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Any lawyer that exercises public power has a higher duty to act with transparency, accountability, and with regards to Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
Oct. 5, 2012), ECF No. 89; Federal Trade Commission Brief as Amicus Curiae, Professional Drug Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
It's been about eight months since I reported on K.Mizra v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am
I'll be sure to read them all, and to share my observations at the time.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am
It's very shortsighted on some app developers' part to bet on overreaching interpretations of decisions--be it Judge YGR's "consolation prize" injunction in Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 1:38 am
The previous one discussed the L2 Mobile Technologies v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:22 am
Already at the TRO/PI stage she expressed her discomfort with a decision in Epic v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Appeals Administrative/Aboriginal Law: Discrimination; Standard of ReviewCanada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm
The second case, NCAA v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 2:35 am
Sooner than I would have thought when I publshed the latest Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
You can compare it to the Court’s quote from National Society of Professional Engineers (which was originally from Standard Oil v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
TetraTech v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
The European Commission’s directive on trade secret protection will mark a sea-change in protection of trade secrets throughout the European Union. [read post]
