Search for: "POWERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY" Results 21 - 40 of 406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm by Christopher J. Walker
This would not be a good remedy, for instance, in high-volume adjudication systems involving quintessential public rights—like veterans and social security benefits, Medicare reimbursement claims, and immigration. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
The real question was of “necessity, pressing social need and proportionality“. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
If the monitoring involves the processing of special category data, the monitoring is prohibited unless a special category data condition applies e.g., if it is necessary to comply with employment law or social security and social protection law.Consent.The Employment Practices Code notes that there are limitations as to how far consent can be relied on as the legal basis for an employer’s monitoring in an employment context, since the consent must be “freely… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am by admin
”[6] In its decision, the Tribunal similarly adopted the Commissioner’s approach of finding irreparable harm based on the lack of power to award damages: “The Commissioner states that it [the harm] would be irreparable because the Tribunal has no authority to award damages under the merger provisions of the Act and lacks the jurisdiction to remedy the harm that may be suffered by consumers and the broader economy during the interim period in the event… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
Post factum audit by the Interception of Communications Commissioner was judged insufficient.For its understanding of the processes the Court relied upon a combination of sources: the Interception Code of Practice under RIPA, the Intelligence and Security Committee Report of March 2015, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment of 5 December 2014 in proceedings brought by Liberty and others, and the Government’s submissions in the Strasbourg proceedings. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]