Search for: "PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS"
Results 21 - 40
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
The plaintiffs represented investors that had purchased securities in the company’s $345 million April 2008 trust preferred securities offering. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:22 pm
The BC Supreme Court has dismissed a claim made under new legislation making it easier for investors to sue if they purchase shares in the stock market and then suffer a loss because of a publicly-traded company’s misrepresentations or failure to disclose important information. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
During the trial, the corporation’s president testified that he would “prefer” to pay for the Estate’s shares in installments. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:02 pm
Common Stockholders The Court noted that while the rights of preferred stock are contractual in nature, directors still owe fiduciary duties to preferred stockholders (as well as common stockholders) where the right claimed by the preferred “is not to a preference as against the common stock but rather a right shared equally with the common. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:01 pm
In return, the Treasury received, from each Company, one million shares of government stock, warrants to purchase 79.9% of common stock, and $1 billion in initial liquidation preferences, among other things. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:51 am
Investors who bought common stock during the eligibility period stand to receive an average of $6.79 per share, while those who purchased preferred stock can receive an average $168.50 per share. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:58 pm
It also expressed a preference for a quick sale over an orderly liquidation—even at a lower value. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
In the action, the plaintiff alleged that profits in connection with purchases and sales of Discovery Communications voting and non-voting common stock by entities related to a Discovery director were subject to disgorgement under the statute. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm
Doesn’t the proposed use of econometric tools raise the specter of substituting a different economic debate for the “efficient market” debate, as the parties vie for the use of their preferred econometric tool? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:50 am
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Article __. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:24 pm
There were settlement discussions with standstill and confidentiality agreements, a settlement agreement under Florida law, a subscription agreement for new Series A preferred stock, purchase agreements and valuation of warrants. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Plaintiff thereafter brought suit to recover the redemption value of his claimed shares of stock in the P.C. as of 1994, with respect to the 15% stock interest he surrendered at that time, and as of February 1999 with respect to the 16% interest. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
They also claim that the government destroyed shareholder value through stock agreements through which the Treasury Department would receive from each mortgage company: $1 billion in senior preferred stock, preferences for the senior preferred stock, warrants to acquire 79.9% of each company’s common stock for $0.00001 per share, and 100% of the companies’ quarterly profits, starting January 2013. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
The December 22 Opinion First, the court dismissed the ’33 Act claims relating to the July 2007 preferred stock offering due to lack of standing, because none of the named plaintiffs purchased securities traceable to the offering. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:26 am
However, that results in lower proceeds for common stock holders, or even earlier preferred stock investors who must wait in line for the last-in investors to be paid their liquidation preference. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:38 am
The ruling does not relate to the claims of investors who had purchased RBS preferred shares, which claims will proceed. ? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached their duty of loyalty by causing Primedia to call hundreds of millions of dollars of preferred stock that it was not yet obligated to redeem, enriching KKR at Primedia’s expense. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
Plaintiffs argued that the merger occurred at the behest of certain preferred stockholders, who wanted to exit their investment and that “instead of selling to SDL, the board had a fiduciary duty to continue operating Trados independently to generate value for the holders of common stock. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:42 am
” However, plaintiffs alleged that TrueCar instead facilitates dealership solicitations to consumers, the purpose of which is to “haggle” and negotiate over the vehicle purchase. [read post]
