Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Withdrawing service from Texas and Florida: In principle, platforms could decide to geoblock Texas and Florida and just stop offering service there, rather than complying. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Corporate Transparency Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
Meanwhile, Treasury commenced a number of significant consultations during the holiday period, seeking public feedback on how to improve the retirement phase of superannuation, and releasing a consultation paper on a proposed licensing framework for payment services providers. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
And it has been observed so religiously that service to the public has been sadly neglected. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
Amazon’s shift from forced arbitration to Washington’s choice of law provisions Most large technology companies, including Amazon, have forced arbitration clauses and class action waivers in their terms of service (TOS). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
Plan sponsors have no incentive to overpay for health plan services because it is a material corporate expense. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Comments on the NPR will be due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The consultation focuses on the size of the services covered and what uses are being targeted. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
The issue was addressed years ago by law firms and other legal support companies, such as electronic discovery companies, when those law firms and companies achieved compliance with Service Organization Control (“SOC-2–Type 2”) and International Organization for S [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is merit neutral and does not take a view on particular companies, investments, or the assets underlying an ETP. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
The Number of Federal Court Securities Class Action Lawsuit Filings Increased in 2023 Securities class action lawsuits represent the most significant severity risk for public company D&O insurers. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Federal Election Commission, the Court held in favor of a company in striking down political campaign limits as a denial of corporate free speech rights. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
On October 2, 2023, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) proposed amendments to modernize Regulation 4.7, significantly increasing monetary thresholds and expanding disclosure requirements. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
The new offences are characterised as having a higher mens rea threshold than those they replace and can, notably, apply to corporate bodies. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
August: In Nigeria, the French multinational pharmaceutical and healthcare company Sanofi S.A., filed a petition with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) in 2019, alleging that the registration of Sanofi Integrated Services Limited, Sanofi Nigeria Enterprises Limited, and Sanofi Nigerian Enterprise was unlawful. [read post]
