Search for: "Page v. Shelby"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 9:33 am
Shelby Ins. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
From the motion in Shelby Resorts Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:14 pm
An interesting and correct decision from the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in Steele v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
University of Texas at Austin, the affirmative action case; Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:39 pm
”Four years later, Roberts authored the Court’s opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
Shelby ruled in a fifty-three-page opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm
The way that Chief Justice Roberts began his opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:00 pm
In his five-page decision in Burdette v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Noell Krughoff, Shelby Co. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:01 am
Lenhart and Shelby County Deputy Sheriff Patrick Goldschmidt]. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm
Bartlett (2013), Justice Ginsburg's dissent in Shelby County (2013), Justice Breyer's dissent in Jennings v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:42 am
" In Steven Shelby v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
I published this blog's first post on March 19, 2013, a critique of the theater of oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
As he observes near the end of the book, “The history recounted here has a Sisyphean air”—an image that had occurred to me well before it finally appeared on page 368. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Justice Barrett wrote a five-page concurrence, which was joined by Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:01 pm
The state filed a two-page motion to dismiss the case. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 10:04 pm
The judges set the case (Kitchen v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:20 pm
Hans von Spakovsky, in his recent article in the National Review, “Strike Down Section 5,” gets it wrong when he says the Supreme Court should hold Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional in the case now pending before it, Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
