Search for: "Palmer v. Edwards" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 8:03 pm
Vince Vitkowsky, a partner in Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge discusses the case. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:33 am
  To view a Client Advisory concerning this issue by Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge's Securities and Government Enforcement Group, please click here. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:31 am
  To view a Client Advisory concerning this issue by Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge's Securities and Government Enforcement Group, please click here. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
  As we have explained in prior posts, this longstanding rule was never codified in New York, but is a common law principle emanating from the nineteenth century Court of Appeals decision in Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506 (1889). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:44 am by Hanni Fakhoury
Thanks to Mark Pogue of Edwards Wildman Palmer, LLP for serving as our local counsel in the case. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:51 pm
”The prevailing insurer in the matter was represented by attorneys from Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:35 am
Here are some thoughts from Stan Keller of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge: The decision involves whether Textron's tax accrual workpapers were protected from discovery from the IRS as work product. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Thomas B. Griffith
Palmer, the Court remanded a First Step Act sentencing case to the district court to reevaluate Palmer’s sentence given the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm by Giles Peaker
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:08 am by Broc Romanek
Topics include: - Choice of forum provisions - The crowdfunding phenomenon - Breweries we'd like to buy Stan Keller on the Future of Proxy Access In this brief memo, Stan Keller of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge weighs in on the future of proxy access, including the status of the Rule 14a-8 amendment. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:42 am by Kara OBrien
  I recently received this memo from our friends at Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge that discusses the case and its important ramifications. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Edward [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, at para. [read post]