Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 6,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm by Tarunabh Khaitan
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:15 am
The Washington Supreme Court has ruled that courts are not "agencies" under the state's public records law, Chapter 42.56 RCW, in City of Federal Way v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:23 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Según el Tribunal de Distrito, la defensa de error en como el imputado percibió la edad de la víctima no es una defensa disponible según la jurisprudencia establecida en el Primer Circuito en la decisión del caso United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 2:06 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
También, bajo su Fórmula de Compensación para Víctimas, VOCA busca proveer asistencia económica e incrementar los pagos de compensación para las víctimas elegibles. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
”17 Specifically, whether norms recognized by customary international law can ground new private law causes of action in Canada before Canadian courts. 1 Factum of the Appellant Nevsun Resources Ltd. at para 21.2 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2017 BCCA 401 at para 4 [Appeal].3 Ibid at para 2.4 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2016 BCSC 1856 at para 33.5 Ibid at paras 33-36. 6 Ibid at para 26. 7 Ibid at… [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
The latest issue of Humanitäres VÃÂlkerrecht (Vol. 21, no. 1, 2008) is out. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by sally
Maroudas v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280; [2010] WLR (D) 81 “An application under s 53(5) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to upgrade a byway from a road used as a public path to a byway open to all traffic did not need to be made in a single document. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]