Search for: "Park v. United States Lines, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
To accommodate consumer demand, airports across the country have built infrastructure for car rental firms, including dedicated facilities, airport transit, and parking areas. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
June 1, 2020), and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
   Miller noticed the Telegraph had been sent a comment about the same story, and in fact the BBC and Daily Mirror also received lines and background briefings. [read post]