Search for: "Pat Warner" Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
  Steven Willis (Bristows) reports:  "Since that first rapid response seminar, Arnold J has issued a further judgment concerning Warner-Lambert’s right to amend the Patent after the trial and whether that amounted to an abuse of process (Generics (UK) t/a Mylan v Warner-Lambert [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am by Rose Hughes
The High Court ([2022] EWHC 822 (Pat)) found the patent to lack sufficiency and inventive step. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  Andrew did not consider Arnold J’s rejection of Warner-Lambert’s attempt to amend its patent post-trial (and finding that such amendment would amount to an abuse of process) ([2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)) or Floyd LJ’s upholding of the decision ([2016] EWCA Civ 1006) to be controversial. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:05 am by John Jascob
[This story previously appeared in Securities Regulation Daily.]By Joanne Cursinella, J.D.Senator Mark Warner (D-Va) and Sen. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by James Hamilton
Bi-partisan legislation introduced by Senators Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Tom Carper (D-DE) would raise the 500-shareholder threshold for SEC reporting to and exempt banks from SEC registration as municipal advisors. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
Dems: Jack Reed (D-RI) Max Baucus (D-MT) Tom Harkin (D-IA) Carl Levin (D-MI) Tim Johnson (D-SD) John Kerry (D-MA) Mark Pryor (D-AR) Richard Durbin (D-IL) Mary Landrieu (D-LA) Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) Joe Biden (D-DE) John Rockefeller (D-WV) Republicans: Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Wayne Allart (R-CO) Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) Thad Cochran (R-MS) Norm Coleman (R-MN) Susan Collins (R-ME) John Cornyn (R-TX) Larry Craid (R-ID) Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) Pete Domenici (R-NM) Michael Enzi (R-WY) Lindsey Graham… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
 On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
His decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:16 am
The factual basis for the claim was (i) Teva had obtained a Europe wide marketing authorisation for generic efavirenz around the turn of the new year; (ii) Teva refused to provide an undertaking to BMS that it would not launch while BMS’s patent remained in force, nor would it provide any information regarding the date on which it intended to launch; (iii) Teva has previously launched a different drug, atorvastatin, on a large scale prior to expiry of the relevant patent, without notice to the… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
 The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Brian Cordery
Following Warner-Lambert CA II, Warner-Lambert sought to engage the NHS with a view to revising this guidance. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:45 pm
" ANOTHER UPDATE: Advisers tell Bush to stand pat on Iraq. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:54 am by Ben
 Sony, Universal and Warner have all filed separate legal proceedings in the Saint Petersburg & Leningradsky Region Arbitration Court, with Russian music industry trade group NFMI and global recorded music industry body the IFPI both backing the action. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]