Search for: "Paul Tam"
Results 21 - 40
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2021, 5:28 am
Paul (1992) ("[A] State may choose to regulate price advertising in one industry but not in others, because the risk of fraud (one of the characteristics of commercial speech that justifies depriving it of full First Amendment protection is in its view greater there. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
While the law does not include a qui tam whistleblower reward provision, it does contain whistleblower protections for corporate employees. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
While the law does not include a qui tam whistleblower reward provision, it does contain whistleblower protections for corporate employees. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:09 am
Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 383, 393 (1992) ("fighting words," defamation, and obscenities fall outside the First Amendment). [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
Paul airport manhandles man on crutches, causing him to fall and get injured. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:17 am
But even in the absence of Tam, I’m almost certain the Team would have continued its use of the marks. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:05 pm
Pre-claim inquiry coverage also relates to qui tam claims under the FCA, in that a company might choose to conduct an internal investigation upon notice of a qui tam complaint in advance of any formal charges by the DOJ. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:03 pm
Notably, False Claims Act actions may be initiated by the DOJ or by private actors known as relators, in a qui tam lawsuit. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
Tam was pitch perfect. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
[The plaintiffs are claiming, among other things, "group libel. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:47 pm
Tam (2017). [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
Tam (2017), which makes clear that discrimination against supposedly disparaging ideas or language is viewpoint-discrimination). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Paul, even restrictions on true threats are unconstitutional if they discriminate against bigoted viewpoints.) [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Tam, which struck down a rule that excluded "disparag[ing]" trademarks from certain kinds of trademark enforcement benefits.[5] In Matal, the Patent and Trademark Office refused to register the trademark "The Slants," because it perceived the mark as a derogatory term for Asians. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
“Fuck the Draft”In 1968, during the Vietnam War, Paul Robert Cohen wore a jacket with the slogan “Fuck the Draft” while in the corridor of a California courthouse. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
B/c author and work are inseparable, the death of the author must signal the death of the right.Commentary by Paul Gugliuzza, Boston University School of LawOriginal 14 year term seems to have come from the first patent statute, which itself was double the usual apprentice term. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
And on Feb.28, Brashears and Deputy FSIS Administrator Paul Kiecker met with Chandler Keys with the Keys Groups and Kendra Waldbusser with Pilgrim’s Pride. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
Tam, which struck down the registration bar for the other type of offensive trademarks — those deemed disparaging. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm
Tam found that the Lanham Act’s disparagement provision violated the First Amendment, the PTO is holding back on approving any trademarks related to that word as potentially violative of the scandalous provision. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:10 pm
These whistleblower, or qui tam, actions comprise a significant percentage of the False Claims Act cases that are filed. [read post]
