Search for: "Paul v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Texas Tax Court Judge Ronald Buch ruled that the petitioners “may use predictive coding in responding to respondent’s discovery request” and if “after reviewing the results, respondent believes that the response to the discovery request is incomplete, he may file a motion to compel at that time”. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Vol. 33, 2013). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
” He also mentioned the recent decision in SEC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
In fact, Alan Morrison submitted an amicus brief on behalf of two former commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service, arguing that the AIA should apply. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, had no fewer than a half-dozen complex (at least to some of us) algebraic formulations. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:25 am
The pointless burden put on innocent taxpayers by the IRS shoot-the-jaywalkers enforcement of the already ridiculous international reporting rules is most disgraceful of IRS Commissioner Shulman’s many policy blunders. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Total Mauritius Limited v Mauritius Revenue Authority, which was heard on 19 June 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Total Mauritius Limited v Mauritius Revenue Authority, which was heard on 19 June 2011. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:09 am
Commissioner, is by Paul Husband, a California equine lawyer whose practice emphasizes tax matters. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
To achieve these same goals, groups such as Democracy21 and the Campaign Legal Center have promoted changes to the Internal Revenue Code, while the American Bar Association has encouraged Congress to make pertinent amendments to the Lobbying Disclosure Act. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Paul Tonko (D-NY) have introduced legislation into the Senate and House of Representatives intended to extend the HIRE Act, which was signed into law by President Obama on March 18, 2010, by six months.District of Columbia - D.C. [read post]
