Search for: "Paul v. Dept. of Human Services of: Paul"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Dept 8th Cir. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEA - Burdens of proof + bifurcation issueso o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Ø Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here5th Circuit> Braymiller v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
The trend was especially evident in the governance of behavior traditionally beyond the reach of states—transnational economic activity.[10] There was a sense that the appropriate approach to the management of behavior (by states or private institutions) was increasingly centered on the ability of decision makers to deploy data within algorithms to develop finely tuned systems of reward and punishment, which would manage appropriate behavior, hold individuals accountable, and contribute to… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Paul Mollica calls this a genuine head-scratcher] Cox v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSWIKI here Noted here: SCOTUSblog (argument recap)Gross v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 21, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of Dept Public Works ee's pro se race discrim complaint>> Rambacher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereGross v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Our response to the trilemma should be informed by an understanding of lawyers’ cognition patterns qua humans 3. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
