Search for: "Paul v. Trump et al" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Paul F. Prestia
Biogen IDEC et al. and Mayo Collaboratives Service, et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
” The ACLU and lawyers for two military psychologists who helped develop the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program released a statement announcing a settlement today in Salim et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Paul Cassell
A brief filed by law professors Nora Freeman Engstrom et al. argues that the Court should review the issue of a prosecutor's obligations in connection with correcting false testimony at trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
Separately, on August 2, 2016, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
’”At Casetext, David Boyle surveys the “’Christian’ amicus briefs” “either for Petitioners, Trump et al., or for neither party. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the Eastern District of Virginia’s ruling in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
The ACLU of Ohio challenged a set of protest restrictions passed by the city of Cleveland in Trump et al v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Paul Bernal https://t.co/HP1FHubcLY 2020-05-09 Sign-in wrap agreement enforced in Babcock v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released a seminal case that aggressively concludes that the union's constitutional right will prevail over an individual's privacy rights arising out of the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act ("PIPA"): Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, et al v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]