Search for: "Paxton v. Paxton"
Results 21 - 40
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 7:02 pm
Paxton. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Paxton. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
Paxton, 2022 WL 1743668 (US Sup. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 10:04 am
Paxton, 2024 WL 982225 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:51 am
From Chron: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton last week seemingly expressed support for the Supreme Court potentially overturning past rulings on cases involving the LGBTQ community following the downfall of Roe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
In a split decision, the Fifth Circuit reverses district court decision in NetChoice v Paxton. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:31 am
For example, one of the lawsuits cited by Paxton early in the complaint, Trump v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:42 am
“How the White House is responding to Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:32 am
” [cite to USTA v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In May we posted about the Eleventh Circuit's ruling in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:32 pm
“Appeals court rules Texas can ban emergency abortions in spite of federal guidance; The Biden administration had appealed a district judge’s ruling that sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton”: Zoë Richards of NBC News has this report. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 1:35 pm
” JACOB SULLUM Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether to take up Villarreal v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
Here's the full text of his press release:Attorney General Ken Paxton yesterday joined West Virginia’s amicus brief in Robinson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:22 am
Thus, Paxton was dismissed from this suit. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Annunciation House, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
The complaint stems from the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 4:04 pm
Paxton.] [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
No one has yet challenged this provision, so it was never enjoined and remains available for AG Paxton to enforce. [read post]
