Search for: "Pelt v. State" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 Put another way, how much illness in the United States is caused by foodborne pathogens? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:12 am
The newspapers wanted the names of the officers who allegedly pelted civilian cars from a bus that was used as transportation for a police officer’s bachelor party. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:14 am
The United States Supreme court held that the draft was constitutional in the case of Arver v. [read post]