Search for: "Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in Salomaa v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars certain claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Comment: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has long defied easy analysis when it comes to insurance issues. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
In its petition, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania claims the court of appeals erred in granting habeas relief because the court (1) determined only that Pennsylvania courts misapplied state law, as opposed to clearly established federal law; (2) construed accomplice liability in a way that conflicts with Pennsylvania law; and (3) failed to credit evidence favorable to the prosecution and apply the presumption of correctness required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the district court decision. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:11 am
Botticella appealed the decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bankruptcy -- An explicit general release in favor of debtor's principal on behalf of all parties with claims against debtor, contained in confirmed plan of reorganization which was never appealed, is binding on a creditor that had adequate notice of plan terms and opportunity to object where the language of the plan and confirmation order covered the claimIn re: FFS DATA, INC., LIVE DATA GROUP, INC., Debtors. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
The fact that the three Circuit Judges were unanimous in upholding half of District Judge Bolton’s ruling suggests that at least some of the federal government’s preemption claims have considerable legal weight and may be upheld on appeal, even by a conservative U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Browning Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, 691 F.2d 1117 (3d.Cir. 1982). [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
Insurance -- Condominiums -- Assignment of claims -- Neither Declaration of Condominium nor Articles of Incorporation prohibited Association from assigning potential insurance claims for hurricane damage to former unit owners -- Trial court erred in dismissing former unit owners' claims against insurer -- Trial court did not abuse discretion in certifying unit owners as a class? [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
The technicians submitted declarations stating that they and other cable technicians were commonly assigned to work in excess of 40 hours per week, but were paid on a “per piece” basis and not paid overtime compensation; that there were common practices of assigning, scheduling, monitoring, and supervising the work of the technicians; and that the company exercised control over the technicians’ work, including assigning their routes and schedules. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Couple that with the fact that Scalia is now seventy-eight – nearly the age Justice Harry Blackmun was when, in Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Lead Industries Ass’n, 994 F.2d 112, 123 (3d Cir. 1993), one of his first ever PLAC amicus assignments. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
G.C. appealed the district court judge’s grant of summary judgment on his 4thAmendment claim, so the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm
This Second Circuit decision is largely unremarkable, but for footnote *, which observes that Judge Alison Nathan was originally assigned to the appeal as a district-court judge sitting by designation but now appears on the panel decision as a full-fledged circuit-court judge. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
In Pennsylvania, Lowman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
He stated in the memo that this plan would lawfully result in the election of Trump. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:53 am
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (3d Cir. 8/5/15) [pdf], the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware), rejected the mailbox rule and ruled that its presumption does not apply when an employer sends FMLA forms via regular snail mail, and the employee, without any other support, denies that he or she received the forms in the mail. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2014). [read post]
