Search for: "Pennsylvania v. UPMC"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2019, 1:50 pm
In UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside and SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania, the NLRB eliminated the “public space” exception that it created in 1982 and returned to a more pure interpretation of Babcock & Wilcox. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
UPMC HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 7th, 2019) involves a claim alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Dittman v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
On 6 December 2018 Nicklin J heard applications in the case of Morgan v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 1:55 pm
Dittman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:50 am
On the eve of Thanksgiving the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its decision in Dittman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:10 pm
On November 21, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in Dittman v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:25 am
The case, Dittman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:43 am
Right before Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (SCOPA) issued its opinion in Dittman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
UPMC, 2018 Pa. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania dealt with this very issue in City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania dealt with this very issue in City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:57 am
UPMC Hamot, September 25, 2017, Rothstein, B.). [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania last month dismissed a class action lawsuit, Dittman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:52 am
UPMC dba The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, January 12, 2017, Olson, J.). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 6:24 pm
She filed suit against the hospital alleging violations of the ADEA and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Dittman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
” The case of Keller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
A district court in Pennsylvania found a reasonable basis for concluding that her discharge, ostensibly for turning in a requested email an hour late, was pretext for discrimination, given that none of the incidents described by the employer were mentioned in the letter, the employee’s previous discipline did not list discharge as the next step, and she had good reviews (Franzi v UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside). [read post]
