Search for: "People v. Garcia (2000)"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
Women, 201 F.3d 144, 149 (2d Cir. 2000); Avins v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Tomaydo also asserts that the menu items are purposefully coordinated with each other, but never identifies any creative manner by which they are. * I never got the chance to blog the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinions in Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
” Garcia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
California before the Supreme Court in 1951, three years before Gus Garcia and Carlos Cadena made their historic argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2000) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Faulks, 201 F.3d 208, 209 (3d Cir. 2000); United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court, January 07, 2008 Arave v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
[Side note: The other three surnames on the top-10 list in the US are Garcia, Rodriguez, and Martinez, which few people would mistakenly associate with our new man in Washington.] [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Colt and Smith & Wesson had functional prototypes by 2000, followed by dozens of startups. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Matter of DCH Auto v Town of Mamaroneck 2022 NY Slip Op 03929 Decided on June 16, 2022 Court of Appeals Wilson Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
