Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)"
Results 21 - 40
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
It was to be a complaint laid before the court of British and world opinion.Its purpose was to persuade those in a position to judge that the actions of American revolutionaries were justified both asa matter of law, that is, as a matter of general principles of political and moral theory. and as a matter of fact, that is, on the application of these principles to the specific acts of mistreatment suffered by the American colonies at the instigation of the government… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
. . suggest[ed] a superior level of receptive language functions” and that her “measures of nonverbal domains including memory, spatial processing and nonverbal abstract reasoning” were above average. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
That rule makes clear that a parent-child tie can be created by consent without any biological tie.Moreover, to the extent the marital presumption is a benefit of marriage, rather than a tight proxy for a genetic tie, it must be available to same-sex as well as different-sex couples in order to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:37 pm
Superior Court (2011). [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants) People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
He was the point man in a court case that reverberates to this day, and he outsmarted many people who tried desperately to silence him. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
He has been a member of the National Academy of Arbitrators since 1970. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
Furthermore, six other judges, one in the Ontario Supreme Court and five on the Ontario Court of Appeal, also held it was valid. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:16 am
Superior Ct of Amador Cnty, 470 P.2d 617 (Cal. 1970) (killing of fetus) Whitner v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
Patricia Schmitz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
