Search for: "People v. Teague"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Sometimes people trip when business fail to clean up broken or fallen items. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Teague, 212 N.J. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm
" This is consistent with the Court's treatment of the questions of what is a "new rule" for the purpose of retroactivity under Teague v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:05 am
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Court’s jurisdiction rested on an exception to the non-retroactivity of new rules.In Teague v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:27 am
Citing its 1989 precedent in Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Kentucky and Teague v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Eighteen years after Mackey, the Court in 1989 again famously (critics would say infamously) adopted Justice Harlan’s suggestions, in Teague v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Alabama is retroactive to persons whose convictions and sentences are final and who are seeking collateral review, pursuant to this Court's opinion in Teague v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
He rejected the petitioner's argument that exhaustion was futile in light of People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Some academics and defense lawyers tried to claim that the new limit was either a codification of Teague v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am
The majority further went on to hold that it was not creating a "new rule" within the meaning of Teague v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
United States, 14-361, the peculiar case that asks whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, or whether it’s enough to conspire with the people whose money they’re taking. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Texas, 14-292, involving a quadruple homicide from so long ago that people still thought I had promise. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
Applying Teague v. [read post]
