Search for: "People in Interest of LJ"
Results 21 - 40
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
I will leave people to read the judgment for Lewison LJ’s summary of the law of ejectment from the middle ages to the present, ad also of the relation of common law and equity latterly involved. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:59 am
Two are “in individual cases for any of the law enforcement purposes” or “in individual cases for a legal purpose”—unless the public interest in the transfer is outweighed by a data subject’s fundamental rights and freedoms. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
[This is a 6k+ word blog post that was joyless to write and most likely will be joyless to read.] [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 11 August 2022, the Court of Appeal (Arnold LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) gave judgment in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The parties are directly adverse in interests. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Clause 21 would amend s.10 of the Contempt of Court 1981 to provide, in relation to “journalistic sources” (see cl.37(1) & Sch.5, para.1(3) to the Bill), that before requiring a person to disclose, or finding a person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the identity of a journalistic source, the court would have to be satisfied not only that such disclosure was necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of crime or… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:30 am
It is already a landmark, and in this part of London, landmarks of such interest and artistic distinction are too rare for the Court to sanction the removal of one as striking and as significant as this one. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
England and Wales End of life care, “best interests”: JB. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Chief Rabbi and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster have issued a joint Press Release, reproduced below, which warns of the risk to vulnerable people should Parliament back a new attempt to change the law on assisted suicide. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
In the context of privacy rights, there is a distinct undertone of self-interest to the press’s opposition. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
The Claimant’s video The charity Mind promotes Mental Health Awareness Week so that people who have experienced mental health problems can share their stories with others who might be suffering in silence. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Thus representative actions are based on the commonality of interest between claimants. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Lauing LJ and Warby LJ in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952 on 21 December 2021. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm
In upholding the first instance decision, Dingemans LJ reiterated the principles to finding malice from Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Collectively, with the number of people impacted by the processing, the potential liability of Google was estimated to exceed £3bn. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
There are some interesting points of tension, to which I’ll return. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
The Defendants’ relied on qualified privilege (duty/interest and reply-to-attack) as a defence, and a reply of malice. [read post]
