Search for: "People in Interest of MCL" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2021, 6:56 am
page=getObject&objectName=mcl-722-23 https://www.leagle.com/decision/inmico20120921438Read More [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
  Sources: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-chap552.pdf https://www.maritallaws.com/states/michigan/alimonyRead More [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
page=getObject&objectName=mcl-750-165 https://www.michigan.gov/documents/dhs/DHS-PUB-748_209001_7.pdfRead More [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:57 pm
  Sources:  https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prepare/index.html http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-chap552.pdfRead More [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:31 am by Matthew Benedict
Anyone contemplating representing themselves should take a look at the statute, MCL 780.621, available here. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:31 am by Matthew Benedict
Anyone contemplating representing themselves should take a look at the statute, MCL 780.621, available here. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:16 am by Matthew Benedict
  Unfortunately, the form fails to address the factors found in MCL 722.31, factors that people must demonstrate to secure permission from the court to move. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:16 am by Matthew Benedict
  Unfortunately, the form fails to address the factors found in MCL 722.31, factors that people must demonstrate to secure permission from the court to move. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:13 pm by Matthew Benedict
One of the changes in the MMFLA included the elimination of disclosure by every person that has an ownership interest in the applicant in favor of disclosures by people holding a 10% or more ownership interest. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:13 pm by Matthew Benedict
One of the changes in the MMFLA included the elimination of disclosure by every person that has an ownership interest in the applicant in favor of disclosures by people holding a 10% or more ownership interest. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
One of the most common places where people may need car rentals is at an airport. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
This article will also review the surprising shift in the necessity challenge standard recently applied by the Michigan courts in the decisions of Village of Oxford v Nathan 1 Act 87 of 1980, MCL 213.51 et seq. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
July 6, 2015: [Respondent] sent a private Facebook message to multiple people, with regards to the above mentioned comments made on the St. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:38 am
  Sources: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-act-91-of-1970.pdfRead More [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:15 am by Matthew Benedict
”  The Court of Appeals held that the in order for evidence over ten years to be admissible under MCL 768.27b,  under the “interest of justice” exception found in MCL 768.27b(4), the evidence must be “uniquely probative or that without its admission, the jury is likely to be misled. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
Sedenquist, supra.The court goes on to explain that [o]ur Supreme Court recently interpreted MCL 750.213 in People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
’ Accordingly, our Supreme Court `sever[ed] MCL 769.34(2) to the extent that it is mandatory and [struck] down the requirement of a ‘substantial and compelling reason’ to depart from the guidelines range in MCL 769.34(3). [read post]