Search for: "People v Atkinson" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm by NARF
Poitra (Jurisdiction; Evictions) In re Skursky (Indian Child Welfare Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Atkinson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
“I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Atkinson W, Wolfe S, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, eds. 11th ed. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
Jan. 10, 2022) Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Google Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
services that can profitably pursue this option, they would engage in massive overremovals and giving fewer people access to their publication tools. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Rather, a journalist should not be penalised for making a wrong decision on a question of meaning on which different people might reasonably take different views. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
That framework saw an executive far more subservient to the legislative branch and far more ministerial in nature (George Washington’s entire executive branch numbered fewer than 100 people). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” In that case, Judge Atkinson accepted that “the family courts in particular have generally welcomed McKenzie Friends. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit noted in Atkinson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Panopticon Blog had a piece about the representative action in the case of Atkinson v Equifax, which has now been withdrawn. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am by Phil Dixon
Atkinson, 298 N.C. 673, 259 S.E.2d 858 (1979) (victim a “walking bombshell”); State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This sentiment was supported by Justice Binnie in R. v. [read post]