Search for: "People v C." Results 21 - 40 of 11,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am by sally
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People sought to introduce the exhibits under the business records which was considered as an exception to the hearsay rule under section 4518 (c) the Civil Procedure Law Rules. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
Read this opinion -- or at least the first dozen pages or so -- and see whether you think the defendant:(A) Wouldn't have done the same thing but for his initial religious upbrining;(B) Wouldn't have done the same thing if he wouldn't have abandoned that upbringing;(C) A mix of both (A) and (B). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm by Bartolus
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-118/07 Commission v Finland on the need to amend existing bilateral agreements with non member countries concluded by a member State before it acceded to the EU. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
Cry, it was clear that people who pled guilty before April 24, 1996 could still seek section 212(c) relief. [read post]